Instead of wasting hours and sometimes days trying to complete a game, use our hacked games with cheats to fast-track ahead. With all that extra time you can play even more arcade flash games - and with nearly 2, of them and growing! At Arcadeprehacks. From popular games such as Sprinter and Flood Runner to Wheels and Zombies and Impale 2 - stop reading this and let the arcade gaming begin!
Username: Password: Lost your password? Register here. Featured Arcade Games. Sort: Newest Rating Popularity. Flash Unity. Hmm, I would have to say that both partners are right. I love phpBB with a passion as well as vB. To me, both are easy to hackup and customize it as I have before. You can check out my forums at. I wouldn't go so far to say that phpBB is not safe though - the development team keeps pretty current and addresses security holes fairly quickly.
In addition, due to the pricetag, the developers seem to have more of an obligation to address bugs quicker than phpBB developers, who are not monetarily compensated. Another thing is that phpBB 2. It will also be compatible to changing file permissions so they are not viewable and such.
Whatever it is, its going to be good. Also, 2. Overall, I love phpBB, but vBulletin is my choice for security, 'eh atleast for now. I've got it running on my site for about 7 days now if you'd like to see it in action:. Yes, it is phpBB basically, just with some added features. So, basically it is phpBB, just with some added hacks and other security features. In my opinion when it comes down to it, IntegraMod is still at an even level, because with all the mods on there, it may not be secure much.
You may also prove me wrong. Like Dani said, its phpBB nevertheless. I dont agree with csgal on one thing when she says VB code is difficult for hackers to obtain because pirated copies of VB are found all over the web.
A simple search on google and you can get it. At the end of the day its the development that counts, VB and IPB are rapidly developing softwares thus security holes are sealed over and over as compared to open source like phpbb which hasnt really been developed much.
You have to relize, these forum softwares say that they are secure, but when an exploit or something is fixed, another exploit or problem is started but not yet known. All forum softwares would agree.
I'm running a phpbb2. Each of the forums on the board is 'private', and I have three groups of users: group A is granted access to everything, group B is granted access only to some of the forums and group C is granted no special access to anything it is used so that I can send emails to a subset of the users.
I recently moved a particular user from group A to group B and that user has now told me that she is in fact able to view all of the forums even though she is in the restricted group she remains in group C as well but that group has no special access rights to anything. She says that the way she figured out to gain access to the forums she is not supposed to have rights to read was 'simple'. I'm assuming she did not get a username and password from any user in the other group.
Any ideas about what a 'simple' way would be for a user to gain access to a private phpbb forum when she is not in a group that has been granted access and has not seperately been granted access as a user? I checked the DB tables and in fact she is only in the restricted group and no permissions ahve been changed. I know it is possible to crack this stuff through brute strength particularly since we do not require difficult passwords , but since she said what she did was 'simple' I am guessing that is not what she did.
The user in question has told me exactly what she did to gain entrance: she simply clicked on the link that appears in one of the old topic reply notifications she received a while ago which she received when she had access to the forum in question and that takes her right to the topic where she can scroll up or down. But that strikes me as odd, since when I try to sign in as a user without access to a certain forum and then click to a link to a post in that forum, I am properly told there is no such post or topic.
Here's an idea: is it possible that she is only seeing a cached picture of the page she had looked at before when she originally had received the topic reply notification and clicked the link? I can't seem to reproduce that with my browser firefox , but is that a possibility? She clicks the link in the email and looks at the page.
Would the browser typically save that in cache?? The browser shows her the cached page rather than trying to actually get a new page since presumably if it tried to get a new page she would get a 'no topiic exists' message. Like I said, i can't reproduce this on my opwn browser, but does it makes sense and is it the most likely explanation? How does a browser know when to get a new page with a particular address versus when to show a cached page?
You can check out my forums at www. My forums isent just a phpBB. Post by nellynico » Fri Dec 26, pm. Post by Lumpy Burgertushie » Sat Dec 27, am. Post by Peter77sx » Sat Dec 27, pm. Post by Lumpy Burgertushie » Sun Dec 28, pm. Quick links. Have an Extension request? Post your request here for help. Note: This forum is community supported; while there is an Extensions Development Team, said team does not dedicate itself to handling requests in this forum.
0コメント